وليد خالد احمد، د. موحد نازري بن موحد وارب، د. وليد خالد عبدالجبار، د. محمد الشيخ.
English Authors
Waleed Khalid Ahmed, Mohd Nazri bin Mohd Warip, Waleed Khalid Abduljabbar, 4Mohamed Elshaikh
Abstract
The main aspect of this work is to study the differences and define the behaviour of
two different routing protocols. The first side is Dynamic MANETs On- Demand (DYMO)
while the other side is proactive, optimal link-state routing (OLSR) and both the first and
second are interactive routing protocols in the Ad-hoc network (VANET). The efficiency of
these protocols was analysed and studied based on the use of three performance indicators:
PDR, normal load (NRO) and end-to-end de1ay (E2ED) on the ability to change the size of
different nodes. Omnet ++ was used by the INET Framework. We also used the SUMO
simulation tool to build random movement patterns for VANET. From full simulation, we
noticed that OLSR is doing better than DYMO for VANET at a price. Late and, as a result, the
development of OLSR work in VANETs compared to DYMO, packet receipt ratios (PDR),
side-to-side delay, normal path load, and VANETs.
Publication Date
4/17/2020
Publisher
International Conference on Technology, Engineering and Sciences (ICTES)
وليد خالد احمد العاني | WALEED KHALID AHMED AL-ANI | 8431